Friday, November 27, 2009

Where are we going?

(Image: Interactive Installation, Viewer generated image, Korea Media Art Festival 2008, artist unknown)

A quick note.

This week, i've seen at least 8 people, older than myself and working state they didn't know what they were doing with their lives.

I feel like there's a little malady in the planet. Its called whiplash and that's made any sort of certainty more difficult. Simply looking at the recssion here: We've been used to stellar growth here in Singapore, and suddenly the GDP hits something like -14% in a quarter and then before we know it its positive 6-9% and back down to 2-4%. If this were an omni-max movie (or IMAX as the Americans call it) we'd all be vomiting our guts out on the floor from nausea. We're not sure where our country is headed.

Whiplash in SMU: well, there was a time when this university graduated 60% finance graduates. There was a time when it was clear that finance was the way to go and how one would be rich and have a good life. You see, in Singapore, we like having a plan, a path, a certainty. Right now, it seems that finance is coming back. But it isn't really certain, what's clear is that the jobs will pay less and will be harder to get. I feel that most people haven't realized that the degree path that they've embarked on may not have the same results that it was supposed to get at the beginning. The plans we can possibly make for our lives, well, have changed from the day i've stepped into university to now. Its going to be an unbelievably long period of slow economic growth. It isn't clear what paths are good going forward. As with this recession, the origins of the next one will be invisible to the man on the street and to people not specialized in that particular area.

Social Whiplash: In Singapore, within 10-20 years, the bulk of the population would have been well educated, the old "hokkien peng (soldiers)" are literally, old. Most Singaporeans have learnt to trust the government, but the Singapore government is arguably the most powerless it has been since the years after independance, we've become the most trade reliant country in the planet, with massive contingent risks on others. The solution to economic woes is to import growth through the ablities of foreign talent in different sectors. However all the industries (this is a developed economy problem it seems) that will bring growth in the next decade, use specific, highly skilled labour in small quantities. Consumers or the general Singapore populace will be hard-pressed to feel the benefits of any growth and will not have the spending to drive the broader economy.
[Integrated Resort notwithstanding, that's of uncertain success]

All in all, only a few of us will be richer, the vast majority of us can count on being poorer or worse off if we're not as good as the migrants/PRs/imported talent (global talent: needed in any city). The home that we live in is going have an unrecognizably different populace (about 40% new Citizens/PRs/temporary residents), an experience akin to our grandparents (1940s-50s) in a Singapore of people still aclimatizing from their different countries than our parents in a "nation-building" (1960s-80s) Singapore. (Population going forward: Indian Indians, China Chinese, Singapore Chinese/Malay/Indian/Others and ALOT of "Others")

We can't even forecast where to place our feet properly. The sources of value in our time are somewhat unknown. I'd argue that it will come from the computer as the tool of our time, and as with all good things in this planet, it'll come with (catastrophic) risks which we hopefully will recover from after a nice recession (as usual, again...). The general trend is that for Singaporeans to make more money, we have to work overseas, to set up lives abroad, while keeping our links to a home that is constantly in flux.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

A star has fallen - Yasmin Ahmad

Yasmin Ahmad (1958 -2009)

The heartfelt voice of South-East Asian film. In Singapore best known for the MCYS ads on Family (Red Shoes and the funeral). To me, the only person who dared to talk about race so openly yet so subtly that it touched the heart.

This is my thoughts on her passing. I met her twice.

Warm, a ball of energy and positive. I saw her at the traffic light opposite SMU, Joe (my twin) had just photographed her for Straits Times a few days before. She was walking with Bee Thiam from the Asian Film Archive. I recognized her and Bee Thiam and was surprised when she said hi to me, recognizing my face but also knowing i wasn't Joe. (filmmakers are damm sharp okay, most people get confused by twins, and Yasmin Ahmad was among e best of them) She sent her regards to Joe.
-- This was within the last year, i don't even remember when. --

Even before that, i watched Rabun, her first feature, and she was there to talk about it. I don't think i had the courage to go up to talk to her at the National Museum (then at its temporary premises at Riverside Walk). I remember respecting her, and the images of the film still stay in my mind. It hit me a couple of hours ago. I think her parents out-lived her.

Why was she important to me?
Because she talked about race, and love between races. She didn't talk. She showed. Images of love, affection that crossed boundaries. I've never been able to talk about race in any creative work that i have done. I'm mixed race, Chindian and i feel it very keenly in Singapore. I'm neither Indian nor Chinese and both sides treat me weird, people don't intend it, but they do. Sometimes, when I talk to a chinese stranger they'll naturally talk to me in English first, even when i speak to them in Mandarin (which i'm slowly growing more comfortable with).
为何人要看别人的皮肤的颜色
I felt that Yasmin Ahmad would tell those stories that challenge our sterotypes on race and change the world slowly through her films.
I couldn't talk about race and how i felt about the whole thing (how it was enshrined in education, how i hate having "Indian" on my IC when i speak exactly one word of Tamil and no Malayalam) I felt i could rest and let Yasmin Ahmad tell those stories. She's lived a strong and long life with much rich experience, let her tell the tales. I looked up to her and wished for my own love story, a life wealthy in love and not difference and a life not spent looking at others through lines of class and race.

Now she is gone and there is no one to tell the stories of Malays and Chinese and Indians, struggling to live in the urban jungles of Singapore, KL, Johore Baru, the tensions in the rural heartland of peninsula malaysia. When Yasmin Ahmand tells a story of Malaysian people, she tells a story that resonates in Singapore (she doesn't intend this, she makes movies about people, people and just plain people.)

How now? Who is going to tell those stories. Maybe we have to learn to speak from our hearts, and clear our own cobwebs. To look beyond our racial and class silos in Singapore, the basic materialism (educational qualifications, income and posessions) and see the greatest value in life is to hold someone's hand, and hug a friend. People are people who are just plain people.

Thank you for that lesson Yasmin. Thank you for that 2 minute chat at the traffic light, and the vibe of fresh confidence you give off. God Bless you on your way. Your work will not be forgotten, Inshallah.



credit: http://southeastasiancinema.wordpress.com/2009/07/25/yasmin-ahmad-1958-2009/
Yasmin Ahmad (1958 - 2009)
A few quotes from Yasmin Ahmad:
"I just hate borders and I hate those arbitrary divisions between people. I simply want to make films about humanity. Ever since I was young, I was always concerned about humanity – not in a Mother-Theresa-kind of way, but I was interested in the day-to-day-interactions between people. I find that in our pursuit to achieve success, we sometimes forget some basic human qualities, like kindness and compassion. I always tried to inject those feelings that I have into any film that I make, whether it is an advertising film or a movie. For me, film is the opportunity to remind human beings to be human again."

On whether her films are about malaysian identity
"No, they are basically about people. There were some local critics who said that my films were championing the Chinese, and others said that my commercials were championing the Indians, and the Malays were complaining anyway. But I kept saying my films are about human beings, and I want you to forget about the race of the protagonists half an hour into the film, and focus on their character. I say that specifically because Malaysians are so aware of the race issues in the country. But now, that my films have won, thank god, international awards nobody can say anymore that I make films just for Malaysians."

Her Two MCYS ads: (which she's known for in Singapore)
Funeral:
Family: (a.k.a The red shoes one)

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Can google be dislodged?

I like this article which details a few points on how google can be dislodged.

My opinion:
1) Real-Time news and search [think #awaresg, localized, real-time citizen journalism]
2) Getting actual answers [Wolfram Alpha]
3) Image and Spatial search: The world's information is not always going to be in text. When my generation grows up (haha..) we aren't going to settle for stuffy essays and journals where you have to pay extra to publish diagrams
[ironically, MIT's journal Presence on ... (drumroll) Virtual environments (read: 3-D environments) charges extra for diagrams (2-D) to be published http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/pres]
We're going to use videos, slides, pictures, voice and 3-D spaces. (make your own sculpture/ virtual room... i remember my balsa wood model of Raffles Place from primary school) In addition, phones will allow us to capture our surroundings and transmit them to friends. Or at least as stripped down idea of the space. [hmmm.. is anyone doing this yet? its just about putting 3-D markup languages (think HTML for 3-D) and some sensors (eg. GPS, 2-D to 3-D recognition software) together.

Joe (my twin) told me he was thinking about "What is the next news media?"
I told him it was the wrong question. The right one was "what is the next way we are going to communicate?" News is only an application of that larger question. but i think we were agreed that news is not just newspapers. Twitter is now a news source too, and so is citizen journalism.

Anyway.. i'm writing alot as usual... (yes i'm long winded).
Here's the snippets from the article that i liked and the link is at the bottom.


"The best way to approach Google search is probably not by taking on its main strengths: its ubiquity and its broad horizontal sweep." - Erika Morphy (article's author)

=====

"The way to successfully compete with a large player like Google is by specializing in an area where you have specific domain expertise and where presentation of results is substantially different than what you would expect from general search results," Mike Janes, CEO of FanSnap, told the E-Commerce Times

=====

"As Twitter has shown, Google has some vulnerability when it comes to real-time search," Marc Engelsman, VP of client services at Digital Brand Expressions, told the E-Commerce Times.

"Google is working on this and just upgraded their algorithm last week," Engelsman pointed out, "and while Google News is pretty good for 'news,' it is still not so good at being a go-to resource for less newsy searching for what's happening this very minute."

Yahoo or Microsoft may try to exploit this vulnerability -- and if they do, if it will be a game-changer, he predicted. "People seem comfortable using alternative resources as they need to -- like switching to Wikipedia when looking for certain types of information.

=====

Google has built a huge moat in the search space, so any challenger will need to make mammoth strides in improving the search experience in order to take any of its market share, Joshua D. Barsch, CEO of StraightForward Media, told the E-Commerce Times.
"If Google has any vulnerability, it's in the enormous volume of results it provides, which can overwhelm some users," Barsch


Original Article:
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/67124.html